Pages: [1] |
1. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Regarding two ships: The Deimos change is unfortunately counter-productive. While a tank change would indeed promote people to rep their ships somewhat more than speed-gank fitting (even though the ship was clearly designed for all out gank), los...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2008.02.02 18:18:00
|
2. New series of chronicles, Black Mountain: On This Earth - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Talia Tigerpaw Edited by: Talia Tigerpaw on 24/09/2007 22:53:20 Personaly I did not enjoy the "headshot drawing" nor that of the "nude" restrained women in the chair. Not because I have something against dark art. But be...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.09.26 17:17:00
|
3. Conclusions from Internal Affairs, a new Dev Blog from Arkanon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Oh by the way, for the couple of early-page goons who asked about time marks on the messages... Look at the SENT DATES on the internal emails, and the petition log. They're all there, and are from the 8th/9th, in the timeframe before Sharkbait we...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.30 04:32:00
|
4. Conclusions from Internal Affairs, a new Dev Blog from Arkanon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You tinfoilers are insane. Rambling over this pretty obvious stuff, the actual PETITION LOGS, you whine about there being no timestamp? As if that automatically invalidates the screenshots? It seems that nothing will satisfy this type. CCP has c...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.30 04:24:00
|
5. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
There's no reasoning with some of these completely wacky claims. Are you actually suggesting that the Devs work for an in-game party? That a GM would join a corp and spy, with their powers for one alliance? Last I thought, isn't Sharkbait an Empl...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 05:37:00
|
6. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Princess Morenta Originally by: CCP kieron Originally by: Fofalus Also the response to the deleted petition a separate issue or is just being buried with this one? It is not possible for a GM or Developer ...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 04:24:00
|
7. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Etien Aldragoran As RE: question 1, Deleted, ignored, closed, whatever, the MINUTE someone filed a petition asking why these events took place they should have received a reply, NOT have to wait 3 weeks, incur the threadnaug...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 04:09:00
|
8. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aries Acheron on 28/05/2007 03:31:08 This is completely different it seems from the T20 incident. That was a definate case of one side getting an advantage (though it can be argued if it was a company 'policy' or the off-hand action...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 03:32:00
|
9. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hello? Have you read my ACTUAL argument? If a member of CCP honestly wanted to screw the said party over, they could have done it without giving you a hint that it happened. Unlike the metaphorical apartment manager, the management here is omnipot...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 03:26:00
|
10. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aries Acheron on 28/05/2007 03:22:17 Originally by: Svaha Norbu Originally by: Aries Acheron Meanwhile, there seems to be zero evidence that there was 'misconduct'. It's like the landlord of your apartment block pos...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 03:21:00
|
11. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The key question is, what would constitute 'proof' to quiet up a lot of the accusing party? The answer seems to be nothing. It was stated that it was a checkup/bugfix/whatever, and Sharkbait used OVERT METHODS, instead of obviously sneaking around...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 03:05:00
|
12. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Melworth Edited by: Melworth on 28/05/2007 00:12:13 Originally by: CCP kieron The petition was submited on the 6th of May, Sharkbait acted on the 9th of May and the petition was successfuly closed a few days late...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 00:16:00
|
13. Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kudos to a well made response. It seems about right, a buried Petition with the hundreds that must be made every day, a dev check to do stuff and so on. Then three weeks later, somebody makes a drama bomb. This issue really is satisfied as far a...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.28 00:14:00
|
14. Arkanons News Item on the recent allegations of developer misconduct - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Malloc Memrel (I used to work for Blizz, other completely random stuff... Sorry. But people on the Internet's qualifications are automatically suspect, and using that to establish one's authority is very unreliable. It i...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.05.26 09:08:00
|
15. Exploding Pods, further updates on the Alliance Tournament from Sadie - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The banned equipment probably would include Logistics Drones. Those were way too good in the second tourney, giving you know.. unlimited cap tank, that can be shifted around? And every ship had enough so shooting them down took forever. ~~~ Acti...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.04.28 07:30:00
|
16. Freighters, War Costs and Corp Love, a new Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The problem with Privateers was not that they were wardeccing corps and alliances all over and shooting at them. The real problem was they were doing it nearly for free. Hitting 70 alliances is pocket change. 50 Million Isk is a pitiful sum these...
- by Aries Acheron - at 2007.04.18 02:16:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |